<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There&#8217;s an App for that</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musematic.net/2010/03/13/theres-an-app-for-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musematic.net/2010/03/13/theres-an-app-for-that/</link>
	<description>Rants and raves on the latest trends in the world of museum informatics and  technology. An intrepid cast of experts from the Museum Computer Network and AAM's Media &#38; Technology Committee share their insights, observations and tricks of the trade.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Aug 2010 01:18:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Light</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2010/03/13/theres-an-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-22032</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Light</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=1137#comment-22032</guid>
		<description>Jeremy is right. If Getty vocabularies are to be of use in a Linked Data context, they have to be published as a set of persistent, dereferenceable URLs.  This means there has to be something machine-processible on the end of them when you make a suitable HTTP request - ideally RDF, though Topic Maps would be good too.  And that _has_ to be a free resource, or your conceptual framework has not really been published in a Linked Data sense. 

I look forward with interest to the new guidelines coming out this spring ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeremy is right. If Getty vocabularies are to be of use in a Linked Data context, they have to be published as a set of persistent, dereferenceable URLs.  This means there has to be something machine-processible on the end of them when you make a suitable HTTP request &#8211; ideally RDF, though Topic Maps would be good too.  And that _has_ to be a free resource, or your conceptual framework has not really been published in a Linked Data sense. </p>
<p>I look forward with interest to the new guidelines coming out this spring &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amalyah Keshet</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2010/03/13/theres-an-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-22022</link>
		<dc:creator>Amalyah Keshet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=1137#comment-22022</guid>
		<description>&quot;which takes your compressed txt msgs and xpndz thm to smtng u cn undstnd.&quot;

Hey, I invented this way of writing.  When I was in university, this was my way of taking lecture notes.  And that was, um, several years pre-digital.  

Didn&#039;t use as many z&#039;s, perhaps, which do make it look sexier.  What bothers me is that it takes me FOREVER to write this way on a cellphone, and nanoseconds by hand.  That&#039;s a sure sign of a digital ancestor,  I fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;which takes your compressed txt msgs and xpndz thm to smtng u cn undstnd.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, I invented this way of writing.  When I was in university, this was my way of taking lecture notes.  And that was, um, several years pre-digital.  </p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t use as many z&#8217;s, perhaps, which do make it look sexier.  What bothers me is that it takes me FOREVER to write this way on a cellphone, and nanoseconds by hand.  That&#8217;s a sure sign of a digital ancestor,  I fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2010/03/13/theres-an-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-22014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=1137#comment-22014</guid>
		<description>It will indeed. Especially when they&#039;re free ;-)
Seriously, having the vocabularies is vital, of course, but whilst ULAN, AAT &amp; co. may be the amongst first examples people reach for when talking vocab, cost is an issue to them actually becoming the common language of linked data/semantic web. This has to be dealt with or I expect that the business of controlled vocabularies will stall. Not that I know how or nuffink!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will indeed. Especially when they&#8217;re free <img src='http://musematic.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Seriously, having the vocabularies is vital, of course, but whilst ULAN, AAT &amp; co. may be the amongst first examples people reach for when talking vocab, cost is an issue to them actually becoming the common language of linked data/semantic web. This has to be dealt with or I expect that the business of controlled vocabularies will stall. Not that I know how or nuffink!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
