<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Follow A Museum Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musematic.net/2010/02/01/follow-a-museum-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musematic.net/2010/02/01/follow-a-museum-day/</link>
	<description>Rants and raves on the latest trends in the world of museum informatics and  technology. An intrepid cast of experts from the Museum Computer Network and AAM's Media &#38; Technology Committee share their insights, observations and tricks of the trade.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Urban</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2010/02/01/follow-a-museum-day/comment-page-1/#comment-19903</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Urban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=1029#comment-19903</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, I&#039;d taken a look at 1stfans before, but hadn&#039;t looked at it recently.   And I&#039;m not saying that such things would be bad - in fact that kind of &quot;obscurity&#039; might be good for the smaller number of people who might participate.  

But it would seem to entail more than one strategy for using twitter.  A open, public account that might be less social and another more limited space for selected groups within the museum.  

By the way, I think you are one of those people who have a similar arrangement for your personal twitter accounts - right?   I&#039;ve not been so much contemplating a &quot;Musebarian_out&quot; account, as much as &quot;Musebrarian_local&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, I&#8217;d taken a look at 1stfans before, but hadn&#8217;t looked at it recently.   And I&#8217;m not saying that such things would be bad &#8211; in fact that kind of &#8220;obscurity&#8217; might be good for the smaller number of people who might participate.  </p>
<p>But it would seem to entail more than one strategy for using twitter.  A open, public account that might be less social and another more limited space for selected groups within the museum.  </p>
<p>By the way, I think you are one of those people who have a similar arrangement for your personal twitter accounts &#8211; right?   I&#8217;ve not been so much contemplating a &#8220;Musebarian_out&#8221; account, as much as &#8220;Musebrarian_local&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mia</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2010/02/01/follow-a-museum-day/comment-page-1/#comment-19901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=1029#comment-19901</guid>
		<description>Thanks for mentioning the survey - I&#039;ll share the results over the weekend.

About museums having “members only” twitter accounts - have you seen http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/join/1stfans/ - I&#039;m not a member but I think that&#039;s one of their offerings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for mentioning the survey &#8211; I&#8217;ll share the results over the weekend.</p>
<p>About museums having “members only” twitter accounts &#8211; have you seen <a href="http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/join/1stfans/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/join/1stfans/</a> &#8211; I&#8217;m not a member but I think that&#8217;s one of their offerings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

