Musematic
Towards a Fedora Community for Small Archives

Posted by on Friday June 12 2009

At last fall’s MCN conference, and again at Museums on the Web this spring, I spoke about work that the Jewish Women’s Archive is doing to set up its own repository using open source software. The basic repository we built uses Fedora with the lightest interface imaginable (ActiveFedora)–all we could afford on our own–and is hosted by Amazon’s Web Services–the least expensive hosting option we could conceive. It has worked well for us so far, although we are really ready to figure out the next steps.

We also live in current economic reality. We have done our bit to convince IMLS and NEH that we should spearhead an effort to develop this further, but the odds of a small Archive, even with our technical vision and ability getting such a grant were not high. It is time to focus on a better approach, which, child of the Sixties that I be, is obviously to network with other Small Archives and come up with a collective strategy.

Why Small Archives, and why a collective strategy? First, I believe that Small Archives–organizations like my own and many even smaller, which lack software development expertise and staff–represent the long tail of cultural heritage. If we were to focus just on the collections at major institutions–large universities, museums, etc., we would lose the majority of the world’s cultural heritage right there. And we are losing it. Small Archives and other small cultural heritage organizations are seeing film stock degenerate, images fade, single el cheapo hard disks and even multiple “archive quality” CD-ROMs fail, and are losing even basic physical assets at the usual rate: theft, fire, inadequate funds for environmental preservation … it all takes it’s toll.

When I first started writing about Small Archives, I thought of the plethora of (mostly) small organizations who make up the Massachusetts Studies Network. As often happens, I had not begun to think through the implications. Recent conversations by email with Patricia Liebetrau have brought to light a South African organization–DISA: Digital Innovation South Africa which has been digitising, as a funded project, South African cultural heritage and socio-political history for the past 10 years. During this time they have done extensive training and capacity building in South Africa and neighbouring countries. The same issues always arise – lack of technical capacity to install and customise open source content management solutions and lack of skills know-how for the creation of metadata, workflows and quality control etc. They have been discussing the need for a digital-library-in-a-box solution for unpacking and use in these organisations and institutions.

So, it isn’t just the mom and pop cultural heritage organization in upper New England facing loss of cultural heritage artifacts and information.

The solution, I believe, is both to provide simpler technical solutions–to make installing Fedora usefully as easy as installing Joomla or WordPress. It also has to involve providing hosted solutions, as well. Not every organization can maintain its own installation, and there is no reason why duplicating common infrastructure should be a necessary part of any organization’s mission.

Towards that end, Thorny Staples of Fedora Commons, and New York consultant Howard Goldstein and I have grandiosely founded the Small Archives Solution Community as the latest community project at Fedora Commons. We call it the “Small Archives” solution community, but of course, what we really mean is the mouthful of small cultural heritage organizations–museums, libraries, and archives–who are faced with similar problems–a burning need to preserve a specific, indispensible part of the world’s cultural heritage–and no budget with which to reinvent, or to sustain, new wheels.

We have already found a few fellow travelers at the above-mentioned conferences (and through friends!). If this sounds like your organization, and  you’d like to discuss it more, email me, or comment on this post. I sense a grant proposal, and a damn important project in the offing.

More, as it happens….


4 Responses to “Towards a Fedora Community for Small Archives”

  1. Scott Edmonds
    June 15th, 2009 09:29

    Ari,

    I attended your talk at Museums and the web and would like to hear more about this effort and be informed of the possibility to cooperate. Can you please provide more information?

    Regards,

    Scott


  2. Ari Davidow
    June 15th, 2009 10:41

    Sure! I’d love to. Tell me more about yourself and what ya’ll are doing to help focus? Where are there holes in what is up on the wiki that we need to fill in?

    ari


  3. Eryn Whitworth
    June 24th, 2009 10:41

    Hi,
    I found this a very interesting post. I am a PhD student at the School of Information at University of Texas at Austin. This summer I am consulting with the LBJ Presidential Library and Museum. Making plans to quell threats to the physical and digital integrity of the organization’s finding aids has been a primary concern in my work.

    The framework you are discussing is chief among my recommendations to the organization. Using Fedora and running repository software like DSpace on top. I found it interesting that you have not mentioned digital libraries, or OAI – PMH and OAI – ORE in your post maybe this is content covered in your presentation. I think this will be a key aspect to making a networked Fedora solution work. Your thoughts? Unfortunately I was not able to attend the Museums and Web conference, however I did just attend the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. OAI – PMH and OAI – ORE are the new hot topics in the field. This is very simple and highly sustainable technology.
    I hope we can discuss this more… perhaps another post? If there were a good channel for sharing what we’ve learned about the use of Fedora, and networked digital libraries in archives I would be interested in participating. Small and big institutions are feeling the pinch and we all need lasting solutions. I am less familiar with Fedora implementations, but more familiar with other aspects of networked solutions. Collaboration?
    Looking forward to seeing where this goes!
    Regards and best luck,
    Eryn Whitworth


  4. Ari Davidow
    June 25th, 2009 04:13

    Since Fedora and DSpace are both repository software, I assume you made the same slip of the keyboard I often make and were considering using Drupal as the front end to the repository.

    I didn’t mention either of the OAI standards because I didn’t see them specifically relevant to what I was writing about–I would hope that anyone setting up a public repository would make the contents discoverable via OAI-PMH; and we’re actually in the penultimate scrum of a project to deliver a “mediashow” tool that uses OAI-ORE with what is available on the Drupal end of our web empire. But both of those are sort of side issues, like ensuring that the public interface is accessible to people not using visual browsers (the blind, for instance) or that the web pages themselves adhere to general web standards.

    The bigger issue is coming up with tools that small archives, lacking skilled IT staff, can implement (or access as affordable, hosted services). So, yes, collaboration, indeed, via the Fedora Commons “Small Archives” Solution Community. Come on over the dark side and help out!


Leave a Reply