<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: City of Brotherly Love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musematic.net/2008/10/13/city-of-brotherly-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musematic.net/2008/10/13/city-of-brotherly-love/</link>
	<description>Rants and raves on the latest trends in the world of museum informatics and  technology. An intrepid cast of experts from the Museum Computer Network and AAM's Media &#38; Technology Committee share their insights, observations and tricks of the trade.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:42:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Falk</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2008/10/13/city-of-brotherly-love/comment-page-1/#comment-11208</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Falk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=515#comment-11208</guid>
		<description>Hi, Nik.  The only context in which I&#039;ve ever heard of Web 3.0 references OWL and SPARQL in the development of the &#039;semantic web,&#039; which I&#039;ve always understood to be a vast universe of consistently-tagged data (and datasets), which can then in some way yield greater versatility of search and turn the web into a gigantic portal of apps built to suck in only-relevant data.  Can&#039;t say I wholly understand the concept (something about &quot;smart&quot; searching that leads to AI-built free associations from the commonalities of a variety of search terms which may or may not actually be contained within a given data set or tag cloud/set), but there are places such as the newly-launched site Twine which claim to explain this concept coherently.  (I didn&#039;t understand the Wikipedia article on semantic web -- too techy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Nik.  The only context in which I&#8217;ve ever heard of Web 3.0 references OWL and SPARQL in the development of the &#8216;semantic web,&#8217; which I&#8217;ve always understood to be a vast universe of consistently-tagged data (and datasets), which can then in some way yield greater versatility of search and turn the web into a gigantic portal of apps built to suck in only-relevant data.  Can&#8217;t say I wholly understand the concept (something about &#8220;smart&#8221; searching that leads to AI-built free associations from the commonalities of a variety of search terms which may or may not actually be contained within a given data set or tag cloud/set), but there are places such as the newly-launched site Twine which claim to explain this concept coherently.  (I didn&#8217;t understand the Wikipedia article on semantic web &#8212; too techy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://musematic.net/2008/10/13/city-of-brotherly-love/comment-page-1/#comment-11121</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musematic.net/?p=515#comment-11121</guid>
		<description>The side-by-side posts about museums both being at the forefront of TECHNOLOGY and being mostly TECHNOLOGY illiterate is priceless.

This explains a question I&#039;ve long pondered about the dearth of tech oriented sessions at AAM.   I&#039;ve always wanted to be a good museum pro and proudly march off to AAM, but when push came to shove MCN or M&amp;W was always a better bet.  
Not that AAM should become THE place to learn about TECHNOLOGY, but it would be nice if it wasn&#039;t ignorant.  Thanks for putting up a good fight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The side-by-side posts about museums both being at the forefront of TECHNOLOGY and being mostly TECHNOLOGY illiterate is priceless.</p>
<p>This explains a question I&#8217;ve long pondered about the dearth of tech oriented sessions at AAM.   I&#8217;ve always wanted to be a good museum pro and proudly march off to AAM, but when push came to shove MCN or M&amp;W was always a better bet.<br />
Not that AAM should become THE place to learn about TECHNOLOGY, but it would be nice if it wasn&#8217;t ignorant.  Thanks for putting up a good fight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

